Impact of the Use of Different Diagnostic Criteria in the Prevalence of Dyslipidemia in Pregnant Women

dc.contributor.authorFeitosa, Alina Coutinho Rodrigues
dc.contributor.authorBarreto, Luciana Tedgue
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Isabela Matos da
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Felipe Freire da
dc.contributor.authorFilho, Gilson Soares Feitosa
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-12T14:06:57Z
dc.date.available2019-06-12T14:06:57Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-24
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background: There is a physiologic elevation of total cholesterol (TC) and triglycerides (TG) during pregnancy. Some authors define dyslipidemia (DLP) in pregnant women when TC, LDL and TG concentrations are above the 95th percentile (p95%) and HDL concentration is below the 5th percentile (P5%) for gestational age (GA). Objective: To compare the prevalence of DLP in pregnant women using percentiles criteria with the V Brazilian Guidelines on Dyslipidemia and the association with maternal and fetal outcomes. Results: Pregnant women with high-risk conditions, aged 18-50 years, and at least one lipid profile during pregnancy was classified as the presence of DLP by two diagnostic criteria. Clinical and laboratorial data of mothers and newborns were evaluated. Conclusion: 433 pregnant women aged 32.9 ± 6.5 years were studied. Most (54.6%) had lipid profile collected during third trimester. The prevalence of any lipid abnormalities according to the criteria of the National Guidelines was 83.8%: TC ≥ 200 mg/dL was found in 49.9%; LDL ≥ 160 mg/dL, in 14.3%, HDL ≤ 50 mg/dL in 44.4% and TG ≥ 150 mg/dL in 65.3%. Any changes of lipid according to percentiles criteria was found in 19.6%: elevation above the P95% for TC was found in 0.7%; for LDL, 1.7%; for TG 6.4% and HDL lower than the P5% in 13%. The frequency of comorbidity: hypertension, diabetes, smoking, obesity and preeclampsia was similar among pregnant women when DLP was compared by both criteria. Conclusion: The prevalence of DLP during pregnancy varies significantly depending on the criteria used, however none demonstrated superiority in association with comorbidities. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017; 109(1):30-38).pt_BR
dc.description.localpubSão Paulopt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1678-4170
dc.identifier.numbervol.109 no.1pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://www7.bahiana.edu.br//jspui/handle/bahiana/2942
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.sourcehttp://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20170070pt_BR
dc.subjectDyslipidemias / diagnosis; Pregnancy / high-risk; Pregnancy Complications; Lipids; Prevalence.pt_BR
dc.titleImpact of the Use of Different Diagnostic Criteria in the Prevalence of Dyslipidemia in Pregnant Womenpt_BR
dc.title.alternativeArquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologiapt_BR
dc.typeProdução bibliográfica: Artigos completos publicados em periódicospt_BR

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
ALINA 2017.pdf
Tamanho:
386.49 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:

Licença do Pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
4.68 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: