Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.bahiana.edu.br:8443/jspui/handle/bahiana/2942
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorFeitosa, Alina Coutinho Rodrigues-
dc.contributor.authorBarreto, Luciana Tedgue-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Isabela Matos da-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Felipe Freire da-
dc.contributor.authorFilho, Gilson Soares Feitosa-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-12T14:06:57Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-12T14:06:57Z-
dc.date.issued2017-02-24-
dc.identifier.issn1678-4170-
dc.identifier.numbervol.109 no.1pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://www7.bahiana.edu.br//jspui/handle/bahiana/2942-
dc.description.localpubSão Paulopt_BR
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background: There is a physiologic elevation of total cholesterol (TC) and triglycerides (TG) during pregnancy. Some authors define dyslipidemia (DLP) in pregnant women when TC, LDL and TG concentrations are above the 95th percentile (p95%) and HDL concentration is below the 5th percentile (P5%) for gestational age (GA). Objective: To compare the prevalence of DLP in pregnant women using percentiles criteria with the V Brazilian Guidelines on Dyslipidemia and the association with maternal and fetal outcomes. Results: Pregnant women with high-risk conditions, aged 18-50 years, and at least one lipid profile during pregnancy was classified as the presence of DLP by two diagnostic criteria. Clinical and laboratorial data of mothers and newborns were evaluated. Conclusion: 433 pregnant women aged 32.9 ± 6.5 years were studied. Most (54.6%) had lipid profile collected during third trimester. The prevalence of any lipid abnormalities according to the criteria of the National Guidelines was 83.8%: TC ≥ 200 mg/dL was found in 49.9%; LDL ≥ 160 mg/dL, in 14.3%, HDL ≤ 50 mg/dL in 44.4% and TG ≥ 150 mg/dL in 65.3%. Any changes of lipid according to percentiles criteria was found in 19.6%: elevation above the P95% for TC was found in 0.7%; for LDL, 1.7%; for TG 6.4% and HDL lower than the P5% in 13%. The frequency of comorbidity: hypertension, diabetes, smoking, obesity and preeclampsia was similar among pregnant women when DLP was compared by both criteria. Conclusion: The prevalence of DLP during pregnancy varies significantly depending on the criteria used, however none demonstrated superiority in association with comorbidities. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017; 109(1):30-38).pt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.sourcehttp://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20170070pt_BR
dc.subjectDyslipidemias / diagnosis; Pregnancy / high-risk; Pregnancy Complications; Lipids; Prevalence.pt_BR
dc.titleImpact of the Use of Different Diagnostic Criteria in the Prevalence of Dyslipidemia in Pregnant Womenpt_BR
dc.title.alternativeArquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologiapt_BR
dc.typeProdução bibliográfica: Artigos completos publicados em periódicospt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos Completos Publicados em Periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
ALINA 2017.pdf386,49 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.